Three roles assess the same container by different criteria. A mistake in temperature, autonomy or documents can compromise a shipment.
Project case study2 / 7Self-initiated concept
Corporate B2B website
НОРДКАССЕТА
Thermal-container selection, comparison and documents in one engineering journey.
I built a bilingual product system for logistics, procurement and quality teams.
Working frontend prototype1
Task and constraints
Logistics teams, procurement, quality specialists and cold-chain distributors.
My goal was to bring product selection and qualification evidence into one short, auditable B2B journey.
Prototype scope
These figures describe concept coverage, not business results.-25…+8 °Ctemperature scenarios
48-120 hautonomy range
RU / ENinterface structure
2
Key decisions
Each decision answers a specific product question instead of existing for visual effect.
1
Selection by route
I ask only about temperature, duration, volume and transport mode, then explain the recommendation.
2
Distinct model families
Each family has its own silhouette, construction cue, use case and explicit size scale.
3
Evidence beside the decision
Datasheets, drawings and qualification status live in the product and comparison journey.
3
What you can test
Capabilities marked “Available in the demo” open their exact working screen.
1Engineering selectorAvailable in the demoOpen screen2Model comparisonAvailable in the demoOpen screen3Documentation centreAvailable in the demoOpen screen
4Dealer account and CMSDesigned, not connectedNo live demo screen
4
Interface foundation
The material behind the product structure, states and logic.
1
Model-selection matrix
2
Product CMS schema
3
Localisation structure
5 / Working prototype
Open interactive prototype
The core journey works in the browser. This is a demonstration build: entered data is neither sent nor stored.
Next case study
3ЛАДОНЬ 220Premium e-commerce